In both experiments, ultrasonic backfat measurements made on the side of the sheep opposite to the location of the operator and the second of 2 measurements had a higher correlation with carcass fat measurement C and were better predictors of percentage carcass fat than measurements taken on either the same side of the sheep as the operator or the first 2 measurements.
We conclude that different ultrasound backfat measurements vary in their value in predicting carcass fatness and individual operators should establish the most appropriate measurement.
Keywords: NZSAPAB; Ultrasonic; backfat; sheep; techniques