A simple output/input ratio may not, however, be appropriate for the mixed sheep and cattle systems which are widely used in New Zealand. For these systems, where a competitive or complementary relationship may exist between enterprises, a more complex efficiency ratio that contains elements of the whole farm system is likely to be more appropriate. Furthermore, in a seasonal pasture production system, where the supply of feed is likely to limit production at certain times of the year, feed does not have fixed value. Feed costs therefore become an important component of the efficiency equation. Utilisation by other livestock of a scarce resource (e.g. winter feed) is also likely to have an influence on the economic efficiency of the system. For example, if biological efficiency is ignored then output (weight of calf weaned) may be increased simply by increasing cow size but with no consideration of the extra feed inputs necessary to maintain larger cows, or the pressure that additional feed requirements may place on other components of the system at particular times of the year.
In this paper, the relevance of biological efficiency is explored by comparing both biological and economic efficiencies of four cattle systems - traditional beef cows, beef x dairy cows (with and without twinning) and once-bred heifers - alone and in mixed sheep and cattle policies. We conclude that biological efficiency is a relevant concept, primarily because its components (carcass weigh and feed consumed) are also important determinants of economic efficiency. However marked differences between systems in the value of the carcass produced and/or feed consumed can lead to a poor correlation between the efficiency ranking of systems by biological and economic criteria.
Keywords: NZSAPAB; beef breeding cows; biological efficiency; once-bred heifers; twinning; beef x dairy cross cows.